Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorTomás, JM
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Sanmartín, Melchor
dc.contributor.authorFernández, I
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T19:36:55Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T19:36:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-27
dc.identifier.issn0123-9813spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/3157
dc.description.abstractIntroducción. Los resultados académicos en la escuela, tanto el rendimiento como el sentimiento de satisfacción con ella, han sido estudiados desde diversas perspectivas, dadas sus implicaciones en el diseño de políticas educativas. El objetivo de este estudio es poner a prueba dos modelos estructurales predictivos, uno del rendimiento académico y el otro sobre la satisfacción con la escuela. Método. Estos modelos valoran importantes variables del contexto académico y posicionan el compromiso escolar del estudiante como un mediador de los efectos del contexto sobre las variables resultado. Para poner a prueba estos modelos se ha contado con una muestra de 1164 estudiantes de enseñanza media dominicanos. Los modelos estructurales se estimaron en EQS 5.7. Los resultados empíricos dan apoyo a ambos modelos predictivos; los productos obtenidos apuntan a que el compromiso escolar es un relevante intermediario de los efectos de las variables contextuales y del alumnado en sus logros académicos. Conclusiones. El fruto del trabajo da pie a concluir que hay que replantear el contexto escolar para primar la calidad de la instrucción, las relaciones afectivas entre los profesores y los alumnos, y un clima socioemocional que favorezca el aprendizaje orientado a la maestría. Así, se discuten los resultados obtenidos a la luz de la evidencia anterior y se sugieren también las limitaciones derivadas del carácter transversal del estudio así como las direcciones de cara a investigaciones futuras.
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Scholar academic results, both academic achievement and satisfaction with school, have been studied from different perspectives, given their implications in the design of educational policies. The aim of this study is to test two predictive structural models of academic achievement and school satisfaction. Method. These models pose school engagement as a mediator between the effects of Dominican students’ contextual and individual characteristics on the consequent academic results, in terms of school performance and satisfaction with school. In order to test these two models a sample of 1164 Dominican middle school students was used. The structural models were estimated in EQS 5.7. Results. Obtained results point out that school engagement is indeed an important mediator between the effects of contextual and personal variables at school and the academic results (achievement and satisfaction). Conclusion. These results may lead to reconsideration of school contexts where the quality of teaching, affective relationships between teachers and students and a socioemotional climate which favour mastery-oriented learning, take precedence. Thus, the results are discussed in relation to previous literature, limitations related to the cross-sectional nature of the study are highlighted, and future research directions suggested.
dc.format.extent13 Páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universitaria del Caribe - CECARspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.cecar.edu.co/index.php/Busqueda/article/view/162/153spa
dc.titlePredicción de la satisfacción y el rendimiento escolar: el compromiso como mediador
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0)spa
dc.identifier.doi10.21892/01239813.162
dc.identifier.eissn2500-5766spa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21892/01239813.162
dc.publisher.placeSincelejospa
dc.relation.citationendpage13spa
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume3spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBÚSQUEDAspa
dc.relation.referencesAppleton, J., Christensen, S. & Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369-386.spa
dc.relation.referencesAppleton, J., Christensen, S., Kin, D. & Reschly, A. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.spa
dc.relation.referencesArguedas, I. (2010). Involucramiento de las estudiantes y los estudiantes en el proceso educativo. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 8,63-78.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, J. E., Dilly, L. J., Aupperlee, J. L. & Patil, S. A. (2003). The developmental context of school satisfaction: Schools as psychologically healthy environments. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 206-221.spa
dc.relation.referencesBentler, P.M. & Wu, E.J.C. (2002). EQS user’s guide. CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorman, G. D. & Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. Elementary School Journal, 104, 177-195.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A. y Martin, R. (2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 964-981.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students’ effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 78, 27-49.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.spa
dc.relation.referencesDecker, D. M., Dona, D. P., & Christenson, S. L. (2007). Behaviorally at-risk African American students: The importance of student–teacher relationships for student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 83–109.spa
dc.relation.referencesDotterer, A.M. & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1649-1660.spa
dc.relation.referencesElmore, G.M. & Huebner, E.S. (2010). Adolescents’ satisfaction with school experiences: relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 525-537.spa
dc.relation.referencesEstell, D.B. & Perdue, N.H. (2013). Social support and behavioral and affective school engagement: the effects of peers, parents, and teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 325-339.spa
dc.relation.referencesFinn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.spa
dc.relation.referencesFredricks, J., Blumenfeld, O. y Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.spa
dc.relation.referencesFurrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, M. (2010). El alumno ante la escuela y su propio aprendizaje: algunas líneas de investigación en torno al concepto de implicación. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 8, 11-31.spa
dc.relation.referencesHu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.spa
dc.relation.referencesHughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher–student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 1–14.spa
dc.relation.referencesJang, H., Kim, E.U. y Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (4), 1175-1188.spa
dc.relation.referencesJimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesKlem, A. & Connell, J. (2004) Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262-273.spa
dc.relation.referencesKline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press. Lam, S.F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F.H., Nelson, B., Hatzichristou, C. & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesNie, Y. y Lau, S. (2009). Complementary roles of care and behavioral control in classroom management: The elfdetermination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 185-194.spa
dc.relation.referencesParrales, S., Robles, J. y Arguedas, I. (2013). Involucramiento estudiantil en el proceso educativo: Cuestionario para determinar necesidades de capacitación de docentes. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 13, 1-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesPlunkett, S.W., Henry, C.S., Houltberg, B.J., Sands, T. & Abarca-Mortensen, S. (2008). Academic support by significant others and educational resilience in Mexican-Origin ninth grade students from intact families. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28, 333-355.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaftery, J., Grolnick, W. & Flamm, E. (2012). Families as facilitators of student engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. En S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly y C. Cathy (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. (pp. 345-364) New York, NY.: Springer.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalcompromiso escolar
dc.subject.proposalsatisfacción escolar
dc.subject.proposalmediación
dc.subject.proposalmodelos estructurales
dc.subject.proposalschool engagement
dc.subject.proposalschool satisfaction
dc.subject.proposalmediation
dc.subject.proposalstructural models
dc.title.translatedThe prediction of the satisfaction and the school performance: the commitment as a mediator
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/