Publicación:
Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults /

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorCudris-Torres, Lorena
dc.contributor.authorVinaccia Alpi, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorBarrios-Núñez, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorGaviria Arrieta, Natali
dc.contributor.authorGómez Campuzano, Martha Luz
dc.contributor.authorOlivella-López, Giselle
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Lalinde, Juan
dc.contributor.authorBermúdez, Valmore
dc.contributor.authorLobato Pérez, Olaiza
dc.contributor.authorNiño-Vega, Jorge Armando
dc.contributor.authorNavarro-Obeid, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorOrtega Fernández, Román José
dc.contributor.authorJavela, José Julián
dc.contributor.corporatenameCorporación Universitaria del Caribe - CECAR
dc.contributor.researchgroupDimensiones Humanas (DH)
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T20:50:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground Self-efficacy alludes to personal competence in an individual’s effectiveness when facing stressful situations. This construct has been related to different domains of the health field, finding that high levels of selfefficacy benefit human functioning and enhance well-being. Methods The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for managing chronic diseases (SEMCD-S) by assessing factorial, convergent and divergent validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Likewise, the comparison of self-efficacy according to socio-demographic characteristics was proposed by contrasting latent factors. An instrumental, transactional, descriptive, and non-experimental design study was carried out with the participation of 325 Colombian senior citizens. Results The findings suggest that the scale has appropriate psychometric properties. The one-factor structure exhibited a satisfactory fit, the mean-variance extracted reported acceptable figures and the correlation analysis with other constructs supported this instrument’s convergent and discriminant validity. Likewise, it was invariant to the different socio-demographic aspects examined, while the internal consistency figures were high. Differences in the means of the latent factors were only detected in the academic grade. In this case, older adults with a primary school level attained higher self-efficacy values than those who had completed high school or university studies. Conclusions It is concluded that the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in the Colombian context to measure and compare this construct.eng
dc.description.researchareaDeporte, actividad física y salud.
dc.description.researchareaDesarrollo cognitivo, salud mental y neuropsicología.
dc.description.researchareaGestión ciudadana y del estado en el desarrollo organizacional, social y comunitario.
dc.description.researchareaVulnerabilidad social y grupos poblacionales.
dc.format.extent12 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/10725
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.placeColombia
dc.relation.citationendpage12
dc.relation.citationissue301
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolumeVolumen 11
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBMC Psychology
dc.relation.referencesBandura A. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Therapy Experimental Psychiatry. 1982;13(3):195–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(82)90004-0
dc.relation.referencesBandura A. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J Manag. 2012;38(1):9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
dc.relation.referencesGarcía Álvarez D, Cobo Rendón R, Hernández Lalinde JD. Validity, reliability and factorial invariance of the general self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy scales in university students. Retos. 2022;46:1093–104. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v46.94281
dc.relation.referencesMena-Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza-Parra S. Hacia la Promoción de la Salud. 2018;23(2):67–78. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2018.23.2.5. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno.
dc.relation.referencesMartín Alfonso L, Grau Ábalo JA, Espinosa Brito AD. Marco conceptual para la evaluación y mejora de la adherencia a los tratamientos médicos en enfermedades crónicas. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública. 2014;40(2):222–35.
dc.relation.referencesIglesias Álvarez N. Efectividad de una intervención educativa basada en la autoeficacia para mejorar la adherencia terapéutica en pacientes con hipertensión arterial del CAP de la Barceloneta. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra; 2018.
dc.relation.referencesHirschberg S, Donatti S, Rijana I, Selan V. La relación entre adherencia terapéutica y calidad de vida en la hipertensión arterial. PSIENCIA Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencia Psicológica. 2014;6(2):64–70.
dc.relation.referencesCudris-Torres L, Alpi SV, Barrios-Núñez Á, Gaviria Arrieta N, Mejía Gutiérrez J, Alvis Barranco L, Rios-Carlys G, Cuenca-Calderón SE, Bermúdez V, Hernández-Lalinde J, Riveira Zuleta CA, Bahamón MJ and Álvarez, Herrera JS. (2023) Quality of life in the older adults: The protective role of self-efficacy in adequate coping in patients with chronic diseases. Front. Psychol. 14:1106563. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106563
dc.relation.referencesRitter PL, Lorig K. The English and Spanish Self-Efficacy to Manage Chronic Disease Scale measures were validated using multiple studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1265–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.009
dc.relation.referencesKanan LA, Bellinati N, Veronez C, Pereira L. Self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale: avaliação da autoeficácia no gerenciamento da doença crônica. Revista CUIDARTE. 2018;9(3):2435–45. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v9i3.561
dc.relation.referencesFreund T, Gensichen J, Goetz K, Szecsenyi J, Mahler C. Evaluating self-efficacy for managing chronic disease: psychometric properties of the six-item self-efficacy scale in Germany. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011. 01764.x.
dc.relation.referencesEslami A, Daniali SS, Mohammadi K, Reisi-Dehkordi N, Mostafavi-Darani F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Self-Efficacy in Chronic Disease Patients. Iran J Nursering Midwifery Res. 2017;22(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.202065
dc.relation.referencesKim SN, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Lee N. Validity and reliability of Korean Version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021;51(5):617–29. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.21069
dc.relation.referencesMarconcin P, Tomé G, Carnide F, Yázigi F, Campos P, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the self-efficacy to manage chronic disease 6-item scale for european portuguese. Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa. 2021;46(1):15–22.
dc.relation.referencesIncirkus K, Nahcivan N. Validity and reliability study of the turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;2650(5):1254–61. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-13
dc.relation.referencesMena Díaz FC, Nazar G, Mendoza Parra S. Antecedentes de adherencia a tratamiento en pacientes hipertensos de un centro de salud chileno. Hacia Promoc. Salud [Internet]. 25 de mayo de 2018 [citado 26 de julio de 2023];23(2):67–78. Disponible en: https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/hacialapromociondelasalud/article/view/3603
dc.relation.referencesMattsson M, Sandqvist G, Hesselstrand R, Olsson D, Kwakkenbos L, et al. Validity and reliability of the swedish version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale for individuals with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2022;51(2):110–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2021.1917142
dc.relation.referencesHudon C, Chouinard MC, Bélanger A, Fortin M, Freund T, et al. The self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale – french version: a validation study in primary care. Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2014;2:533–38.
dc.relation.referencesSarhan SA, Kamal DE, Hamed MS, Mostafa DI. Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41(10):2967–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06183
dc.relation.referencesRiehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, et al. Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network investigators. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Research. 2016;68(8):1195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22807
dc.relation.referencesGarcía A, Moreno J, Suárez P. Escala de autoeficacia general: datos psicométricos de la adaptación para población española. Psicothema. 2000;12(2):509–13.
dc.relation.referencesNazar Carter G, Mendoza Parra S, Mena Díaz C. Autoeficacia y estrés como determinantes de adherencia en pacientes hipertensos. Comuna de Retiro, Región del Maule, Chile. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Psicología; 2017.
dc.relation.referencesLorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Lynch J, Laurent D. Outcome measures for Health Education and Other Health Care Interventions. SAGE Publication; 1996.
dc.relation.referencesKim CJ, Chae S, Yoo H. Psychometric testing of the chronic disease self-efficacy scale–korean version (CDSES-K). J Transcult Nurs. 2012;23(2):173–80.
dc.relation.referencesAto M, López-García JJ, Benavent A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Annals of Psychology. 2013;29(3):3. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
dc.relation.referencesBloomfield J, Fisher MJ. Quantitative research design. J Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association. 2019;22(2):27–30. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.738299924514584
dc.relation.referencesNunnally JC. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill; 1967.
dc.relation.referencesClark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:309–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
dc.relation.referencesComrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;56(5):754–61. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.56.5.754
dc.relation.referencesComrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Psychol Press. 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506. 2nd ed.
dc.relation.referencesGuadagnoli E, Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(2):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265
dc.relation.referencesBroadbent E, Petrie K, Weinman J. The brief illness perception Questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;631–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020
dc.relation.referencesKrupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg D. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1988;46(10):1121–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022
dc.relation.referencesKleinman L, Zodet M, Hakim Z, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the fatigue severity scale for use in chronic hepatitis C. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10089607104
dc.relation.referencesMattsson B, Möller IE, Lundberg G, Boström C. Reliability and validity of the fatigue severity scale in swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(4):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740801914868
dc.relation.referencesWare JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
dc.relation.referencesAlonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc). 1995;104:771–6.
dc.relation.referencesGarratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;324(7351):1417–23.
dc.relation.referencesKenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in Models with Small degrees of Freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44(3):486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
dc.relation.referencesHu L, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 199;6(1):1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
dc.relation.referencesSteiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Pers Indiv Differ. 2007;42(5):893–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
dc.relation.referencesHamid MR, Sami W, Sidek MH. Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2017;890. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
dc.relation.referencesHernández Lalinde JD, Espinosa Castro JF, Peñaloza Tarazona ME, Fernández González JE, Chacón Rangel JG, Toloza Sierra CA, et al. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):587–95.
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Lalinde J, Espinosa-Castro JF, Penaloza-Tarazona ME, Díaz-Camargo É, Bautista-Sandoval M, Riaño-Garzón ME, et al. Arch Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 2018;37(5):552–61. https://doi.org/10.17632/x9tghxpdc3.1. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: verificación de supuestos mediante un ejemplo aplicado a las ciencias de la salud.
dc.relation.referencesSatorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192
dc.relation.referencesCampo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades Psicométricas de una Escala: la Consistencia Interna. Revista de Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008;10(5):831–9. Recuperado de:. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42210515
dc.relation.referencesCheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct Equation Modeling: Multidisciplinary J. 2002;9(2):233–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
dc.relation.referencesHancock GR. Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured mean modelling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika. 2001;66(3):373–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294440
dc.relation.referencesCartagena Beteta M. Relación entre la autoeficacia y el rendimiento escolar y los hábitos de estudio en alumnos de secundaria. REICE Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 2008;6(3):59–99.
dc.relation.referencesBarrera-Mesa CE, Caro-Caro EO, Del Rey-Alamillo R. Víctimas de ciberviolencia: formas, prevalencia y diferencias de género. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):239–50. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15268
dc.relation.referencesFröhner J, Beckerle P, Endo S, Hirche S. An embodiment paradigm in evaluation of human-in-the-loop control. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;51(34):104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.036
dc.relation.referencesYang J, Ambrose Lo WL, Zheng F, Cheng X, Yu Q, Wang C. Evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving Pain, Fear Avoidance, and self-efficacy in patients with chronic low back Pain: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Pain Res Manage. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4276175
dc.relation.referencesLa Touche R, Salud CS, La Salle EU, Of Fisioterapia CS, de Madrid A, de La EU. Madrid. How does self-efficacy influence pain perception, postural stability and range of motion in individuals with chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2019;22:E1-13.
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez-Pitti J, Casajús Mallén JA, Trabazo RL, Lucía A, López de Lara D, Moreno Aznar LA, et al. Ejercicio físico como «medicina» en enfermedades crónicas durante la infancia y la adolescencia. Anales de Pediatría. 2020;92(3):173–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2020.01.010
dc.relation.referencesBonilla-Cruz NJ, Moncada HO, Latorre Yáñez JD, Gómez Torres HD, Niño-Vega JA. Psychological well-being and suicide orientation in teachers in Norte de Santander during COVID – 19 confinement. Gaceta Médica De Caracas. 2022;130(Suplemento 3):727–33. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2022.130.s3.26
dc.relation.referencesGrisales-Aguirre AM, Figueroa-Vallejo CJ. Modelado de tópicos aplicado al análisis del papel del aprendizaje automático en revisiones sistemáticas. Revista de Investigación. Desarrollo e Innovación. 2022;12(2):265–78. https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v12.n2.2022.15271
dc.relation.referencesWang DF, Zhou YN, Liu YH, et al. Social support and depressive symptoms: exploring stigma and self-efficacy in a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03740-6
dc.relation.referencesRiehm KE, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier ME, Bartlett SJ, Malcarne VL, Mouthon L, et al. Validation of the self-efficacy for managing Chronic Disease Scale: a Scleroderma patient-centered intervention network Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68(8):1195–200.
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Corporación Universitaria del Caribe CECAR
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01347-4
dc.subject.proposalSelf-efficacy
dc.subject.proposalChronic diseases
dc.subject.proposalPsychometric properties
dc.subject.proposalOlder adults
dc.subject.proposalColombia
dc.titlePsychometric properties of the self-efficacy scale for chronic disease management (SEMCD-S) in older Colombian adults /eng
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/IFI
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
s40359-023-01347-4.pdf
Tamaño:
1.36 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

BAD. Dimensiones Humanas (DH)