Publicación:
Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social: Nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea

dc.contributor.authorBarana, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorRocha Carneiro, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorPaschoarelli, Luis Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Osorio, Pedro Arturo
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de investigación teoría e historia de la arquitectura y la ciudad
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T13:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractSe toman como punto de partida las “contracorrientes” que visionaba Gui Bonsiepe en 1978, sobre la práctica del design. Se revisa el perfeccionamiento de esas ideas a partir de la evolución del concepto de sostenibilidad, su enfoque social y su relación con la innovación y el design. En correspondencia con los planteamientos de Bonsiepe, se identifican cambios en el papel del design para atender nuevas necesidades sociales; como ejemplos se presentan intervenciones de design participativo e innovación social, que generan alternativas de desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Nuevas realidades hacen más importantes las capacidades de construcción de productos intangibles. La acción política del design es cada vez más urgente; los designers están llamados a cumplir un papel protagónico en la construcción crítica de la nueva ciudadanía. Un nuevo campo de acción, el design social.spa
dc.description.abstractThis paper takes as its point of departure the “counter-currents” envisioned by Gui Bonsiepe in 1978 regarding the practice of design. The development of these ideas is reviewed based on the evolution of the concept of sustainability, as well as its social approach and relationship with innovation and design. In line with Bonsiepe’s ideas, the paper identifies changes in the role of design in order to meet new social needs; as examples, it presents interventions based on participatory design and social innovation, which generate alternatives for local development in the contemporary city. Due to new realities, the ability to construct intangible products is ever more important. The political action of design is more and more urgent; designers are called to play a leading role in the critical construction of new citizenship identities. A new field of action: social design.eng
dc.description.researchareaCiudad y territorio sustentable en el Caribe colombiano
dc.description.researchareaTeoria e historia de la arquitectura, la ciudad, el paisaje y el territorio
dc.format.extent18 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMartínez-Osorio, P., Barana, M.Rocha-Carneiro, R. y Paschoarelli, L. (2017). Innovación, design y sostenibilidad social: nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporánea. Revista de Arquitectura, 19(2), 68-77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
dc.identifier.eissn1657-0308
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/10941
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisher.placeColombia
dc.relation.citationendpage77
dc.relation.citationstartpage68
dc.relation.citationvolumeVolumen 19
dc.relation.referencesAlexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https:// doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600
dc.relation.referencesBarbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Königswinter: H. F. Ullmann.
dc.relation.referencesBologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVer nance of commons. Recuperado de http:// www. labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/ Bologna-Regulation-on-collaborationbetween-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cureand-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesBonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of “craft” as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compcom.2014.07.002
dc.relation.referencesChen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/ IJDesign/article/view/2622
dc.relation.referencesEkomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2015.05.075
dc.relation.referencesEl-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267
dc.relation.referencesAbd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism “a pop-up local change for cairo’s built environment”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032
dc.relation.referencesFelicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366
dc.relation.referencesFuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.
dc.relation.referencesGuimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/ UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudosemdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369
dc.relation.referencesHarazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi. org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154
dc.relation.referencesHillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/ sdrj.2016.92.04
dc.relation.referencesHowaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.
dc.relation.referencesHuybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities ‘work’. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), https://doi.org/100- 111 Doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05
dc.relation.referencesIbarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo. org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid= S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng =es
dc.relation.referencesKelkar, N. P. y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 54-66. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.4013/ sdrj.2016.92.01
dc.relation.referencesLydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu. com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_ urbanism_vol.1.
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06
dc.relation.referencesManzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
dc.relation.referencesMarttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.4013/ sdrj.2016.92.03
dc.relation.referencesMatei, C. S. (2014). Globalization – An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/ Doi: 149.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.207
dc.relation.referencesMcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.
dc.relation.referencesMcKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa. edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/ downloads/wp27.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.5151/978858 0392647-01
dc.relation.referencesMoura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings, 2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ despro-ped2016-0246
dc.relation.referencesMulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-whatit-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf
dc.relation.referencesNapawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/ sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02
dc.relation.referencesNavastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108
dc.relation.referencesPacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122- 14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en
dc.relation.referencesPatarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.
dc.relation.referencesPhills, J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.
dc.relation.referencesPapanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design - Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).
dc.relation.referencesPinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.
dc.relation.referencesPollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.12.068
dc.relation.referencesRomeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065
dc.relation.referencesSadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.08.119 Doi: 201, 62-70
dc.relation.referencesSalonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2016.05.382
dc.relation.referencesSanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Cocreation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068
dc.relation.referencesSarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2015.03.227
dc.relation.referencesSelloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07
dc.relation.referencesTyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https:// doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024
dc.relation.referencesTung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www. ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/ view/1077
dc.relation.referencesUnesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://unesdoc. unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO. pdf
dc.relation.referencesYair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394
dc.relation.referencesvan Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. https:// doi.org/ Doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06
dc.relation.referencesVilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia´s neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008
dc.relation.referencesWalker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.
dc.relation.referencesWWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasileira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ ecologica_global/
dc.rightsCorporación universitaria del caribe – cecarspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://doi.org/10.14718/revarq.2017.19.2.1406
dc.subject.proposaldesignspa
dc.subject.proposaldesign participativospa
dc.subject.proposalinnovación socialspa
dc.subject.proposalsostenibilidadspa
dc.titleInnovación, design y sostenibilidad social: Nuevas tendencias para el desarrollo local en la ciudad contemporáneaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7e362fb6-8aae-4325-b87b-fd2a16d885c6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7e362fb6-8aae-4325-b87b-fd2a16d885c6

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
document (2).pdf
Tamaño:
2.88 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: