Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMelchor Gutiérrez, Sanmartín
dc.contributor.authorTomás Miguel, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorJover Martínez, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T19:42:42Z
dc.date.available2022-09-15T19:42:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-21
dc.identifier.issn0123-9813spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.cecar.edu.co/handle/cecar/3125
dc.description.abstractLa cantidad de investigaciones sobre bienestar subjetivo ha experimentado un aumento durante las últimas décadas. Por lo tanto, supone un gran interés disponer de instrumentos para su medición validados en los contextos de uso, para así aumentar la calidad de esta. El instrumento que más se emplea para medir la satisfacción con la vida es la “Satisfaction With Life Scale” (SWLS). Por ello, el propósito de este trabajo ha sido analizar las propiedades psicométricas de esta escala. La muestra la conformaron 1332 jóvenes angoleños, con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y los 30 años, procedentes de distintas localidades del norte, centro y sur de Angola. Los análisis de validación factorial confirman que los 5 ítems que configuran la escala conforman una estructura unifactorial. Los índices de consistencia interna, al igual que la validez nomológica, indican de nuevo que la SWLS es una escala válida y fiable para evaluar la satisfacción con la vida. Por último, los análisis de Teoría de respuesta del ítem ofrecen valiosa información sobre la fiabilidad de la medida, y sobre el carácter altamente discriminatorio de los ítems que la componen.
dc.description.abstractResearch about subjective well-being has had an increase during the last decades. Therefore, it is of great interest to have validated measurement instruments in the contexts of use, in order to increase the quality of this. The most used instrument to measure life satisfaction is the “Satisfaction with Life Scale” (SWLS). Thus, the purpose of the present study has been to analyze the psychometric properties of this scale for its use in Angolan young adults. 1,332 people formed the sample, with ages varying from 18 to 30 years, coming from different northern, center and southern Angolan localities. The factorial validation analyzes confirm that the five (5) items that make up the scale conform a unifactorial structure. Internal consistency indexes, as well as nomological validity, again indicate that SWLS is a valid and reliable scale for assessing satisfaction with life. Finally, the item response theory analyzes provide valuable information on the reliability of the measure and on the highly discriminatory nature of the items that compose it. Finally, the theory analysis of the item response provide valuable information on the reliability of the measure and on the discriminatory nature of the items that compose it.
dc.format.extent12 Páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherCorporación Universitaria del Caribe - CECARspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.cecar.edu.co/index.php/Busqueda/article/view/286/268spa
dc.titlePropiedades psicométricas de la satisfaction with life scaleen jóvenes angoleños: análisis factorial confirmatorio y modelo de respuesta graduada
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0)spa
dc.identifier.doi10.21892/01239813.286
dc.identifier.eissn2500-5766spa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.21892/01239813.286
dc.publisher.placeSincelejospa
dc.relation.citationendpage12spa
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume3spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalBÚSQUEDAspa
dc.relation.referencesAishvarya, S., Maniam, T., Karuthan, C., Sidi, H., Jaafar, N., & Oei, T. (2014). Psychometric properties and validation of the Satisfaction with life scale in psychiatric and medical outpatients in Malaysia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55, 101-106.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the hebrew language version of the satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267-274.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, F. M. (1974). Social indicators of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 1, 279-299.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum.spa
dc.relation.referencesArrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 health young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815-826.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with life scale: analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Diferences, 35, 1255-1260.spa
dc.relation.referencesAtienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (2000). Psychometric properties of satisfaction with life scale in adolescents. Psicothema, 12, 331-336. Beiser, M. (1974). Components and correlates of mental well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 320-327.spa
dc.relation.referencesBentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. Bigot, A. (1974). The relevance of american life satisfaction indices for research on british subjects before and after retirement. Age and Ageing, 2, 113-121.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). The satisfaction with life scale: cannadian-french validation of the satisfaction with life scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210-223.spa
dc.relation.referencesBöckerman, P., Johanson, E., & Saarni, S.I. (2012). Institutionalisation and subjective wellbeing for old age individuals: is life really miserable in care homes? Ageing and Society, 32, 1176-1192. Chen, C. (2001). Aging and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 54, 57-79. Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. D., & Aarø, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the satisfaction with life scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1307-1317.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeHaes, J. C., Pennink, B. J. W., & Welvaart, K. (1987). The distinction between affect and cognition. Social Indicators Research, 19, 367-378.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17, 304-324.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.spa
dc.relation.referencesDiener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403-425.spa
dc.relation.referencesEasterlin, R. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics, and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 463- 482.spa
dc.relation.referencesEckersley, R. (2013). Subjective wellbeing: Telling only half the story. A commentary on Diener et al. (2012). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 529-534.spa
dc.relation.referencesEdwards, L. (2004). Measuring perceived social support in mexican american youth: Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26, 187-194.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The german version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 127-132.spa
dc.relation.referencesGouveia, V. V., Milfont, T. L., da Fonseca, P. N., & Coelho, J. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five bazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267-277.spa
dc.relation.referencesHansson, A., Hillerås, P., & Forsell, Y. (2005). Well-being in an adult swedish population. Social Indicators Research, 74, 313-325.spa
dc.relation.referencesHultell, D., & Gustavson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in a swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070- 1079.spa
dc.relation.referencesKline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.spa
dc.relation.referencesLai, J., & Wong, W. (1998). Optimism and coping with unemployment among Hong Kong chinese women. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 454-479.spa
dc.relation.referencesLatack, J. C. (1986). Coping with job stress: Measures and future directions for scale development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 377-385.spa
dc.relation.referencesLawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia center morale scale, a revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85-89.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. E. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1091-1098.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Sub, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616 -628.spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas-Carrasco, R., Den Oudsten, B., Eser, E., & Power, M. (2014). Using the satisfaction with life scale in people with Parkinson’s disease: A validation study in different european countries. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1-7.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., Byrn, D. G., & Haugan, G. (2014). Satisfaction with life scale in adolescents: Evaluation of factor structure and gender invariance in a norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657-671.spa
dc.relation.referencesMonk-Turner, E. & Turner, C. (2012). Subjective wellbeing in a southwestern province in China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 357-369.spa
dc.relation.referencesMuthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus User’s Guide (Sixth Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.spa
dc.relation.referencesOswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Science, 327, 576-579. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172.spa
dc.relation.referencesPavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvick, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. NY: Routledge.spa
dc.relation.referencesRenshaw, T. L., Long, A. C. J., & Cook, C. R. (2015). Assessing teachers’ positive psychological functioning at work: Development and validation of the teacher subjective wellbeing questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(2), 289-306.spa
dc.relation.referencesRosengren, L., Jonasson, S., Brogårdh, C., & Lexell, J. (2015). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 132, 164-170.spa
dc.relation.referencesSachs, J. (2004). Validation of the satisfaction with life scale in a sample of Hong Kong University. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 225-234.spa
dc.relation.referencesSancho, P., Galiana, L., Gutiérrez, M., Francisco, E., & Tomás, J. M. (2014). Validating the portuguese version of the satisfaction with life scale in an elderly sample. Social Indicators Research, 115, 457-466.spa
dc.relation.referencesShevlin, M. E., & Bunting, B. P. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1316-1318.spa
dc.relation.referencesShevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911-916.spa
dc.relation.referencesShin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). A vowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B.W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P. y Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesSteiger, J. H., & Lind, C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IAspa
dc.relation.referencesTomás, J., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., Sancho, P., & Lila, M. (2013). Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 299-313.spa
dc.relation.referencesTucker, K. L., Ozer, D. J., Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. K. (2006). Testing for measurement invariance in the satisfaction with life scale: A comparison of russians and north americans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 341-360.spa
dc.relation.referencesUllman, J. B. (1996). Structural equation modeling. In B. Tabachnick & L. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (pp. 709-812). New York: Harper Collins.spa
dc.relation.referencesWong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243-274.spa
dc.relation.referencesZickar, M. J., & Broadfoot, A. A. (2009). The partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. In C. E. Lance and R. J Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends. New York, NY: Routledge.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.proposalSatisfacción con la vida
dc.subject.proposalfiabilidad
dc.subject.proposalvalidez
dc.subject.proposalteoría de respuesta al ítem
dc.subject.proposalautoestima
dc.subject.proposalresiliencia
dc.subject.proposalSatisfaction with life
dc.subject.proposalReliability
dc.subject.proposalValidity
dc.subject.proposalItem Response Theory
dc.subject.proposalSelf-esteem
dc.subject.proposalResilience
dc.title.translatedPsychometric properties of satisfaction with life scale in angolan youth: confirmatory factor analysis and graduate response model
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/